Cursor vs Sourcegraph Cody

Cursor
4.7
Coding
Free / $20mo

Cursor is built on top of VS Code, so most keyboard shortcuts, extensions, and themes carry over — the learning curve is mainly about the AI features layered on. Tab handles intelligent multi-line completions, Cmd+K rewrites selected code inline, and Chat can answer questions about your whole project rather than just the open file. The free tier includes a limited number of fast premium-model requests per month; heavy daily use typically requires the $20/mo Pro plan, and very large codebases can slow down the context-indexing step. Recent updates added Cloud Agents for running longer tasks remotely, Origin for hosting and reviewing code changes, and improved Git support at scale.

Sourcegraph Cody
4.3
Coding
Enterprise only — contracts starting around $16K/year

Cody is Sourcegraph's AI coding assistant, and its core advantage comes from Sourcegraph's underlying code-search engine: rather than only seeing the open file or a small local window, Cody can pull relevant context from across an entire organization's codebase — including multiple repositories — when answering questions or generating code. It supports chat, autocomplete, and predefined "commands" (explain code, generate tests, fix errors) inside VS Code and JetBrains IDEs, and lets teams choose which underlying model (Claude, GPT, Gemini) powers responses. As of mid-2025, Sourcegraph discontinued the Cody Free and Pro tiers entirely — Cody is now an Enterprise-only product priced from $59/user/month on an annual contract, with typical team contracts starting around $16,000. The full cross-repo context advantage is most apparent in larger organizations already using or willing to set up Sourcegraph; individual developers and small teams should look at other IDE assistants instead.

CursorSourcegraph Cody
CategoryCodingCoding
PriceFree / $20moEnterprise only — contracts starting around $16K/year
Cursor
Pros
  • + Full codebase context
  • + VS Code compatible
  • + Excellent autocomplete
  • + Inline edit mode
Cons
  • Expensive for heavy users
  • Slower on large codebases
Sourcegraph Cody
Pros
  • + Excellent context across large, multi-repo codebases
  • + Built on proven Sourcegraph code-search technology
  • + Supports multiple LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini) under the hood
  • + SOC 2 compliant with self-hosted/air-gapped deployment options
Cons
  • No free or individual-developer tier as of 2025 — Enterprise only, from $59/user/month with annual contracts
  • Full value depends on Sourcegraph code search/indexing setup
  • Smaller community than GitHub Copilot
View CursorView Sourcegraph Cody